Last night at about 11:30 I finished all 644 pages of The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo. Probably one of the most talked about books since Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. And probably one of the best first chapters ever. I picked it up the first time because of that first chapter and put it back down because the next chapter was amazingly narrative heavy and plodding.
But then every time I opened a magazine, web page, there it was. Then the movie was coming out and an American version was going to be made. I resisted as long as I could, but I hate that left out feeling. Then Barnes and Noble offered an extra 15% off anything I ordered online and I folded. Thanks, Barnes and Noble. I ended up really getting into the book. The mystery of Harriet’s disappearance and then all the various Vangers and their foibles were addictive. And, after a while, the plodding didn’t seem so, well, plodding. And Blomkvist is a pretty cool male lead.
Unfortunately, the one character I never really warmed up to was Lisbeth Salander, the aforementioned tattooed girl. And that’s probably the point. She is not really an appealing person, even a little frightening. I wouldn’t mind having her computer skills, though. But why is she the title character? She is peripheral until about 2/3 of the way into the book, and even after that she is no more prominent than Blomkvist. I guess it would have been as big a seller if it had been title The Guy with No Snow Shoes. We’ll never know.

the bits of Hitchcock trivia thrown in. The blue parties, Carole Lombard bringing cows and a cowpen on set after Hitch’s comment about all actors are cattle, and the famous Tallulah Bankhead comment. (Censored) He hated Kim Novak because she wouldn’t fall for his stuff. And he played horrendous practical jokes on his daughter Pat.

